Analysis and scansion example free#

More common is alliteration between /g/ and /k/ (e.g. Thus Old English cēap ‘bargain, purchase’ (Modern English cheap) alliterates with cyn ‘race, tribe’ (Modern English kin) in Beowulf 2482: 2 Except in the latest Old English poetry, however, poets do not distinguish between these sounds in their alliteration: stressed syllables beginning with the letter 〈c〉 alliterate with other stressed syllables beginning in 〈c〉 regardless of whether the sound being represented is /ʧ/ or /k/ likewise, stressed syllables beginning with the letter 〈g〉 alliterate with other stressed syllables beginning with 〈g〉 regardless of whether the letter stands for /y/ or /g/. For most of the historical period, these characters were used to represent two distinct sounds each: 〈c〉 was used for /ʧ/, the sound at the beginning of Modern English church (Old English cyric), and /k/, the sound at the beginning of Modern English king (Old English cyning) 〈g〉 was used for /y/, the sound at the beginning of Modern English yard (Old English geard), and /g/, the sound at the beginning of Modern English good (Old English gōd) (see Campbell 1959/1991, Chapter 1). Two exceptions (though they may not look like exceptions to the beginning student) are stressed syllables beginning with the characters 〈c〉 and 〈g〉. This is also true of certain consonant clusters beginning with s: stressed syllables beginning with sp only alliterate with other stressed syllables beginning with sp, stressed syllables beginning with st only alliterate with other stressed syllables beginning with st, and stressed syllables beginning with sc alliterate only with other stressed syllables beginning with sc. Hence s alliterates only with s, b only with b, and so on. When the alliterating syllables begin with a consonant, the sounds must be identical. The following lines show the standard pattern of alliteration (alliterating syllables in bold):Įce drıhten æfter teode Consonantal Alliteration The second stressed syllable in the off-verse must not share in the alliteration. The rule is that one or both of stressed syllables in the on-verse must alliterate with the first stressed syllable in the off-verse. The half-lines are tied together by alliteration. Ƿuldor fæder sƿahe ƿundra gehƿæs e eum foldan frea ælmıhtıg Rıces ƿeard meotodes meahte ⁊hıs 〈mod〉geþanc ƿeorc| There is also considerable evidence to suggest that they were aware of metre as they copied (see O’Brien O’Keeffe 1990 and O’Donnell 1996). While Anglo-Saxon scribes did not place each line of poetry on a separate line in their manuscripts, they often did mark line boundaries and caesuras with a raised point or other punctuation. In Anglo-Saxon manuscripts, poetry is written from margin to margin, as in the following facsimile (reproduction) and diplomatic transcription from the same manuscript (adapted from O’Donnell 2005) 1. The work of the father of glory-as he, the eternal lord,Ĭreated the beginning of each of wonders! The might of the measurer, and his thoughts,

Now we must honour the guardian of heaven, O’Donnell 2005, adapted from the transcription of Tanner 10 ): In modern printed editions, on- and off-verses are separated graphically by a gap of three or four spaces, as in the following except from Cædmon’s Hymn (ed. This caesura is so strong, indeed, that we tend to describe the verse in terms of half-lines: the half-line before the caesura is known as the a-verse or on-verse, the half-line after the caesura as the b-verse or off-verse. A very strong caesura (metrical break) is found between stresses two and three. The basic line consists of four stressed syllables and at least four lesser-stressed syllables (conventionally described as ‘unstressed’). And even when it is found, it never takes the place of alliteration (initial rhyme) in the earlier verse. With very few exceptions, end rhyme does not play a structural role. Like all early Germanic metres, Old English verse is accentual and alliterative. 228-235.Although the Anglo-Saxons left no accounts of their metrical organisation, statistical and linguistic analysis of the poetic corpus has allowed us to come up with a good idea as to how their verse worked.

Analysis and scansion example free#

'A Rationale of Free Verse.' Jahrbuch für Amerikastudien. Universitätsverlag WINTER Gmbh. 1968. New York: Houghton Mifflin Hartcourt Publishing Company. 'Why Don’t Poems Rhyme Anymore?' HuffPost. 'Reflections on Vers Libre.' New Statesman. 'Is Free Verse Killing Poetry?' VQR ( Virginia Quarterly Review). A History of Free Verse. University of Arkansas Press.